manuscript → CapableOf → undergo double blind peer review process
Typicality: 0.594
Saliency: 0.426
Facets 3
based on initial editor screening 4 cause
subsequently 3 temporal
by two anonymous referees 3 other
Open triples 9
manuscript → undergo → double blind peer review process 8
manuscript → go through → double-blind peer-review process 7
manuscript → undergo → double-blind peer review process 6
manuscript → undergo → double-blind peer review 6
manuscript → go through → double-blind peer review process 4
manuscript → undergo → double blinded peer reviewing 3
manuscript → go through → double-blind peer review 3
manuscript → undergo → double blind peer review 3
manuscript → undergo → rigorous double-blind peer review 3
Sentiment analysis
negative neutral positive
0.077 0.831 0.092
Other statistics
Raw frequency 43
Normalized frequency 0.426
Modifier score 1.000
Perplexity 48.460