Assertion list
reviewer (primary) → ReceivesAction
Results from Ascent++: 175
reviewer → ReceivesAction → satisfied 0.61
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected 0.58
reviewer → ReceivesAction → experienced 0.57
reviewer → ReceivesAction → consulted 0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → contacted 0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to declare competing i… 0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → blinded 0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → approved 0.53
reviewer → ReceivesAction → qualified 0.52
reviewer → ReceivesAction → trusted 0.52
reviewer → ReceivesAction → focused 0.51
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited 0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → addressed 0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unaware of each other’s identity 0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → convinced 0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed 0.48
reviewer → ReceivesAction → assessed 0.48
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited to conduct review 0.47
reviewer → ReceivesAction → quick to point 0.46
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to return comment 0.46
reviewer → ReceivesAction → associated with relevant journal 0.46
reviewer → ReceivesAction → excluded 0.46
reviewer → ReceivesAction → completed the review 0.45
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited to review manuscript 0.45
reviewer → ReceivesAction → drawn 0.44
reviewer → ReceivesAction → encouraged 0.44
reviewer → ReceivesAction → accepted 0.43
reviewer → ReceivesAction → concerned 0.43
reviewer → ReceivesAction → aware of affiliation 0.42
reviewer → ReceivesAction → paid 0.41
reviewer → ReceivesAction → independent of author 0.41
reviewer → ReceivesAction → notified 0.41
reviewer → ReceivesAction → suggested by author 0.40
reviewer → ReceivesAction → added 0.40
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by editor 0.40
reviewer → ReceivesAction → surprised 0.39
reviewer → ReceivesAction → bound by same rules 0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → held accountable 0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → reviewed 0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → balanced 0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → critical of conclusion 0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen by person 0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → involved in study selection 0.37
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to comment in their writt… 0.37
reviewer → ReceivesAction → trained 0.35
reviewer → ReceivesAction → willing to provide follow-up ad… 0.35
reviewer → ReceivesAction → based on their expertise 0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → well-versed 0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → identified 0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → bound to treat the manuscript 0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen for their expertise 0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → appointed by the editor 0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to declare any conflict o… 0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to provide formative feed… 0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to provide comment 0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → rejected 0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by program officers 0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → biased 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → willing to overlook an occasion… 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → requested to go through article 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to complete the review 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → blinded to author 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → eligible for reduced price 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → split 0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to make recommendation 0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → notified by email 0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → recognized for their work 0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → resolved through discussion 0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected to evaluate separate c… 0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → assigned to paper 0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → assigned to the application 0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → disqualified 0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → free to decline invitations 0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → matched to the paper 0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → recruited 0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → resolved by consensus 0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → consulted in the case of disagr… 0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → known to each other 0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → mixed 0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to evaluate paper 0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to have scientific deg… 0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected to review submission 0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → engaged 0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to comment on the overlap 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → aware of the authorship of the … 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → concealed throughout the review… 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → critical of glitch 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → drawn into prolonged disputes 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → entitled 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to weigh the contrib… 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → intended to be read by author 0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unaware of the identity of the … 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to address consideration 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → based on recommendation 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → charged 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → completed at least one review 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → consulted to reach consensus 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → conveyed to the author 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → familiar with regulation 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → found on all posts pages 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → found on the past tests 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to emphasize innovat… 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → likely to decline 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → made public 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → reassigned 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to identify relevant p… 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by associate editors 0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by the size 0.26
reviewer → ReceivesAction → removed 0.26
reviewer → ReceivesAction → disappointed 0.26
reviewer → ReceivesAction → confused 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → acquainted with key individuals 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked several questions 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to check statistical meth… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to classify the paper 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to serve as a committee m… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to set the context 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → aware of personal bias 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → based on their publications 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen by neh staff 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen by nsf 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → designated by the chairperson 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → familiar with technical issues 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → flavoured with a dash of sorcery 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → free to change their review 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → informed of final decision 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to address the two m… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to emphasize signifi… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to review application 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited in confidence 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited to review the article 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → known to the journal editor 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → listed on martindale.com 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → necessary to evaluate the resea… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → persuaded to take down their re… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → protected 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → qualified to make judgments 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → queried on correctness 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → referred by number 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → requested to consider a number … 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to be nafme members 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → seated at each station 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by the conference comm… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → supposed to concentrate on the … 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unable to agree a joint outcome… 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unlikely to be aware 0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → delighted 0.24
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by portability 0.24
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by the design 0.24
reviewer → ReceivesAction → cautioned 0.23
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by the durability 0.23
reviewer → ReceivesAction → amazed 0.22
reviewer → ReceivesAction → requested to follow excellent g… 0.22
reviewer → ReceivesAction → frustrated 0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → ignored 0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by price 0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → overwhelmed 0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → encouraged to review the criter… 0.20
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by screen 0.20
reviewer → ReceivesAction → welcome to leave comments 0.20
reviewer → ReceivesAction → acknowledged in final report 0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → certain of author 0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → excused 0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → reluctant to visit cited web pa… 0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → uninvited 0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → discouraged 0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → encouraged to complete the revi… 0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → matched 0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → paired with 4gb of ram 0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → rendered speechless 0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unable to review 0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → overloaded 0.13
reviewer → ReceivesAction → disturbed in their rooms 0.10
reviewer → ReceivesAction → found inside the hreview 0.09