benefit → ReceivesAction → debated
Typicality: 0.393
Saliency: 0.261
Facets 2
due to no scientific backing for it 2 cause
waldfogel et al 2 other
Open triples 2
benefit → be → debated 14
benefit → be debated by → interest groups 3
Sentiment analysis
negative neutral positive
0.075 0.724 0.201
Other statistics
Raw frequency 17
Normalized frequency 0.261
Modifier score 0.600
Perplexity 136.546