Assertion list
reviewer (primary) → CapableOf

Results from Ascent++: 609
reviewerCapableOf remain anonymous 0.63
reviewerCapableOf make comment 0.62
reviewerCapableOf make decision 0.61
reviewerCapableOf provide feedback 0.60
reviewerCapableOf add comment 0.59
reviewerCapableOf write review 0.58
reviewerCapableOf claim credit 0.57
reviewerCapableOf express their views 0.57
reviewerCapableOf review article 0.57
reviewerCapableOf discussed review 0.56
reviewerCapableOf bear in mind 0.56
reviewerCapableOf disclose any conflicts of inter… 0.55
reviewerCapableOf complete their reviews 0.55
reviewerCapableOf recommend rejection 0.54
reviewerCapableOf complete the review 0.54
reviewerCapableOf discuss their comments 0.54
reviewerCapableOf read book 0.54
reviewerCapableOf posted more than one review 0.54
reviewerCapableOf receive email 0.53
reviewerCapableOf sign their reviews 0.53
reviewerCapableOf purchase the product 0.53
reviewerCapableOf assess methodological quality 0.52
reviewerCapableOf explain reason 0.52
reviewerCapableOf opt to publons 0.52
reviewerCapableOf read the paper 0.52
reviewerCapableOf submit review 0.52
reviewerCapableOf accept the paper 0.51
reviewerCapableOf submit their reviews 0.51
reviewerCapableOf make recommendation 0.51
reviewerCapableOf avoid personal comments 0.51
reviewerCapableOf declare any conflict of interest 0.51
reviewerCapableOf see comment 0.50
reviewerCapableOf read the article 0.50
reviewerCapableOf recommend revision 0.50
reviewerCapableOf inform the journal 0.50
reviewerCapableOf volunteer their time 0.50
reviewerCapableOf perform data extraction 0.49
reviewerCapableOf avoid conflicts of interest 0.49
reviewerCapableOf review paper 0.49
reviewerCapableOf provide input 0.49
reviewerCapableOf make note 0.49
reviewerCapableOf make sure to look 0.49
reviewerCapableOf participate in the peer review … 0.49
reviewerCapableOf read the code 0.49
reviewerCapableOf score application 0.49
reviewerCapableOf work in pair 0.49
reviewerCapableOf judge the manuscript 0.48
reviewerCapableOf leave review 0.48
reviewerCapableOf provide review 0.48
reviewerCapableOf maintain anonymity 0.47
reviewerCapableOf evaluate submission 0.47
reviewerCapableOf spend more time 0.47
reviewerCapableOf agree with author 0.46
reviewerCapableOf complete the task 0.46
reviewerCapableOf sign a confidentiality agreement 0.46
reviewerCapableOf go to moderate interest 0.46
reviewerCapableOf take responsibility 0.46
reviewerCapableOf inform the editor 0.46
reviewerCapableOf discuss difference 0.45
reviewerCapableOf receive complimentary copy of t… 0.45
reviewerCapableOf request book 0.45
reviewerCapableOf post review 0.45
reviewerCapableOf identify relevant published work 0.45
reviewerCapableOf say same thing 0.45
reviewerCapableOf reviewed the content 0.45
reviewerCapableOf assess risk of bias 0.45
reviewerCapableOf choose a pick of the year 0.44
reviewerCapableOf operate under strict guidelines 0.44
reviewerCapableOf go to skepticism 0.44
reviewerCapableOf give 5 stars 0.43
reviewerCapableOf give positive review 0.43
reviewerCapableOf follow instruction 0.43
reviewerCapableOf assess abstract 0.43
reviewerCapableOf consider the possibility 0.43
reviewerCapableOf like article 0.43
reviewerCapableOf send in anonymous version 0.43
reviewerCapableOf use the word 0.43
reviewerCapableOf opted to remain anonymous 0.43
reviewerCapableOf identify author 0.43
reviewerCapableOf request clarification 0.42
reviewerCapableOf assess study 0.42
reviewerCapableOf make conclusion 0.42
reviewerCapableOf play vital role 0.42
reviewerCapableOf reviewed the information 0.42
reviewerCapableOf find issue 0.42
reviewerCapableOf read the introduction 0.41
reviewerCapableOf share idea 0.41
reviewerCapableOf get their due recognition 0.41
reviewerCapableOf suspect undisclosed conflict of… 0.41
reviewerCapableOf read the book 0.40
reviewerCapableOf provide the author 0.40
reviewerCapableOf read abstract 0.40
reviewerCapableOf know the identity of the authors 0.40
reviewerCapableOf look at content 0.40
reviewerCapableOf review code 0.40
reviewerCapableOf spend two days 0.40
reviewerCapableOf update their reviews 0.40
reviewerCapableOf evaluate article 0.40
reviewerCapableOf make point 0.40
reviewerCapableOf decline to review manuscript 0.39
reviewerCapableOf submit their comments 0.39
reviewerCapableOf respect intellectual independen… 0.39
reviewerCapableOf post negative reviews 0.39
reviewerCapableOf evaluate following additional i… 0.39
reviewerCapableOf like the way 0.39
reviewerCapableOf collect datum 0.39
reviewerCapableOf abstract datum 0.38
reviewerCapableOf determine scientific and techni… 0.38
reviewerCapableOf review abstract 0.38
reviewerCapableOf agree to review manuscript 0.38
reviewerCapableOf return their comments 0.38
reviewerCapableOf assess study quality 0.38
reviewerCapableOf report concern 0.38
reviewerCapableOf bound by same requirements of c… 0.38
reviewerCapableOf evaluate paper 0.38
reviewerCapableOf reject the manuscript 0.38
reviewerCapableOf like the paper 0.38
reviewerCapableOf perform the review 0.37
reviewerCapableOf check 0.37
reviewerCapableOf provide critique 0.37
reviewerCapableOf do the review 0.37
reviewerCapableOf inform editorial office 0.37
reviewerCapableOf return the manuscript 0.37
reviewerCapableOf submit their reports 0.37
reviewerCapableOf use criterion 0.37
reviewerCapableOf accept the invitation 0.37
reviewerCapableOf apply the inclusion criteria 0.37
reviewerCapableOf assess the correctness of sourc… 0.37
reviewerCapableOf judge the quality of the manusc… 0.37
reviewerCapableOf buy book 0.36
reviewerCapableOf look at figure 0.36
reviewerCapableOf provide constructive comments 0.36
reviewerCapableOf support their judgments 0.36
reviewerCapableOf do good job 0.36
reviewerCapableOf describe their experience 0.36
reviewerCapableOf praise graphic 0.36
reviewerCapableOf praise the game 0.36
reviewerCapableOf spend much time 0.36
reviewerCapableOf provide example 0.36
reviewerCapableOf alert the editor 0.36
reviewerCapableOf determine 0.36
reviewerCapableOf place less emphasis 0.36
reviewerCapableOf raise important point 0.36
reviewerCapableOf review the book 0.36
reviewerCapableOf submit report 0.36
reviewerCapableOf notify the editor 0.35
reviewerCapableOf agree to assess paper 0.35
reviewerCapableOf assess methodological quality o… 0.35
reviewerCapableOf determine the extent 0.35
reviewerCapableOf take look 0.35
reviewerCapableOf take note 0.35
reviewerCapableOf seem happy 0.35
reviewerCapableOf assess trial quality 0.35
reviewerCapableOf conduct the review 0.35
reviewerCapableOf declare possible conflicts of i… 0.35
reviewerCapableOf make effort 0.35
reviewerCapableOf take into account 0.35
reviewerCapableOf look at table 0.35
reviewerCapableOf publish review 0.35
reviewerCapableOf tell 0.35
reviewerCapableOf agree to open peer review 0.34
reviewerCapableOf call the book 0.34
reviewerCapableOf contact the editor 0.34
reviewerCapableOf explain their judgments 0.34
reviewerCapableOf read the manuscript 0.34
reviewerCapableOf search embase 0.34
reviewerCapableOf use the product 0.34
reviewerCapableOf ensure solid impact of papers 0.34
reviewerCapableOf give the review comments 0.34
reviewerCapableOf assign score 0.34
reviewerCapableOf consider each of the following … 0.34
reviewerCapableOf discuss the paper 0.34
reviewerCapableOf do the job 0.34
reviewerCapableOf evaluate application 0.34
reviewerCapableOf recommend the article 0.34
reviewerCapableOf reject the article 0.34
reviewerCapableOf substantiate their comments 0.34
reviewerCapableOf make mistake 0.34
reviewerCapableOf assess the correctness of recom… 0.33
reviewerCapableOf consider the data sharing plan 0.33
reviewerCapableOf contact author 0.33
reviewerCapableOf discuss issue 0.33
reviewerCapableOf draw the editor’s attention 0.33
reviewerCapableOf expect to receive new version 0.33
reviewerCapableOf opt to reveal their name 0.33
reviewerCapableOf provide overall impact/priority… 0.33
reviewerCapableOf rate submission 0.33
reviewerCapableOf seek information 0.33
reviewerCapableOf share comment 0.33
reviewerCapableOf use standardized form 0.33
reviewerCapableOf point out issue 0.33
reviewerCapableOf evaluate conceptual framework 0.33
reviewerCapableOf evaluate general approach 0.33
reviewerCapableOf evaluate originality 0.33
reviewerCapableOf evaluate the file 0.33
reviewerCapableOf evaluate the work 0.33
reviewerCapableOf examine strategy 0.33
reviewerCapableOf extract following data 0.33
reviewerCapableOf follow ethical policies 0.33
reviewerCapableOf formulate their statements 0.33
reviewerCapableOf know the author 0.33
reviewerCapableOf notify the journal 0.33
reviewerCapableOf prepare written report 0.33
reviewerCapableOf provide reference 0.33
reviewerCapableOf return their recommendations 0.33
reviewerCapableOf review change 0.33
reviewerCapableOf review the code 0.33
reviewerCapableOf review title 0.33
reviewerCapableOf share their thoughts 0.33
reviewerCapableOf take care 0.33
reviewerCapableOf guess 0.33
reviewerCapableOf do their utmost 0.32
reviewerCapableOf sign their reports 0.32
reviewerCapableOf give high marks 0.32
reviewerCapableOf inform the editorial board 0.32
reviewerCapableOf accept request 0.32
reviewerCapableOf accept the article 0.32
reviewerCapableOf determine the eligibility of al… 0.32
reviewerCapableOf evaluate tool 0.32
reviewerCapableOf give honest review 0.32
reviewerCapableOf participate 0.32
reviewerCapableOf review document 0.32
reviewerCapableOf suggest correction 0.32
reviewerCapableOf use the information 0.32
reviewerCapableOf do their job 0.32
reviewerCapableOf comment on article 0.32
reviewerCapableOf accept change 0.32
reviewerCapableOf assess full texts 0.32
reviewerCapableOf comment on the paper 0.32
reviewerCapableOf comment on weakness 0.32
reviewerCapableOf conduct their reviews 0.32
reviewerCapableOf discuss discrepancy 0.32
reviewerCapableOf edit review 0.32
reviewerCapableOf indicate iiany substantial simi… 0.32
reviewerCapableOf judge effective usefulness 0.32
reviewerCapableOf make choice 0.32
reviewerCapableOf review the material 0.32
reviewerCapableOf take following factors 0.32
reviewerCapableOf validate for ms-drg 0.32
reviewerCapableOf wish to involve colleague 0.32
reviewerCapableOf find the fit 0.32
reviewerCapableOf start their reviews 0.31
reviewerCapableOf miss the point 0.31
reviewerCapableOf address following questions 0.31
reviewerCapableOf assess the completeness 0.31
reviewerCapableOf bought the product 0.31
reviewerCapableOf compare their results 0.31
reviewerCapableOf consider the following 0.31
reviewerCapableOf engage in discussion 0.31
reviewerCapableOf explain their scholarly judgmen… 0.31
reviewerCapableOf give separate score 0.31
reviewerCapableOf provide evaluation 0.31
reviewerCapableOf provide written feedback 0.31
reviewerCapableOf rate the paper 0.31
reviewerCapableOf review full-text articles 0.31
reviewerCapableOf scan abstract 0.31
reviewerCapableOf specialize in same scholarly ar… 0.31
reviewerCapableOf spend less time 0.31
reviewerCapableOf validate the information 0.31
reviewerCapableOf love the location 0.31
reviewerCapableOf accept the task 0.30
reviewerCapableOf act as arbiter 0.30
reviewerCapableOf approve the article 0.30
reviewerCapableOf correct their review 0.30
reviewerCapableOf leave feedback 0.30
reviewerCapableOf look at live casino games 0.30
reviewerCapableOf look at video poker 0.30
reviewerCapableOf look for reason 0.30
reviewerCapableOf made substantive errors 0.30
reviewerCapableOf make every effort 0.30
reviewerCapableOf provide tip 0.30
reviewerCapableOf raise the issue 0.30
reviewerCapableOf select article 0.30
reviewerCapableOf treat article 0.30
reviewerCapableOf use form 0.30
reviewerCapableOf use standard form 0.30
reviewerCapableOf use the cochrane tool 0.30
reviewerCapableOf praise the music 0.30
reviewerCapableOf get thing 0.30
reviewerCapableOf look at time 0.30
reviewerCapableOf prefer arm's lengthletters 0.30
reviewerCapableOf approach each submission 0.29
reviewerCapableOf concur with the rater 0.29
reviewerCapableOf contact editorial office 0.29
reviewerCapableOf download manuscript 0.29
reviewerCapableOf find ambiguity 0.29
reviewerCapableOf give overall score 0.29
reviewerCapableOf identify relevant studies 0.29
reviewerCapableOf judge clarity 0.29
reviewerCapableOf learn 0.29
reviewerCapableOf love book 0.29
reviewerCapableOf note the mastery of terminology 0.29
reviewerCapableOf pay the editor’s attention 0.29
reviewerCapableOf purchased the item 0.29
reviewerCapableOf read submission 0.29
reviewerCapableOf recommend to the editor 0.29
reviewerCapableOf refer to the work 0.29
reviewerCapableOf submit paper 0.29
reviewerCapableOf use standardised data extractio… 0.29
reviewerCapableOf like the taste 0.29
reviewerCapableOf play the game 0.29
reviewerCapableOf answer specific questions 0.28
reviewerCapableOf check change 0.28
reviewerCapableOf click the link 0.28
reviewerCapableOf come with fresh mind 0.28
reviewerCapableOf extract the potentialities of t… 0.28
reviewerCapableOf find little 0.28
reviewerCapableOf give an 8 0.28
reviewerCapableOf note the completeness 0.28
reviewerCapableOf notify the editor of any simila… 0.28
reviewerCapableOf pay particular attention 0.28
reviewerCapableOf praise the title's replay value 0.28
reviewerCapableOf prepare the review 0.28
reviewerCapableOf read 0.28
reviewerCapableOf recommend the paper 0.28
reviewerCapableOf review available resources 0.28
reviewerCapableOf screen full-text articles 0.28
reviewerCapableOf search database 0.28
reviewerCapableOf select book 0.28
reviewerCapableOf substantiate deep and well-reas… 0.28
reviewerCapableOf tell the truth 0.28
reviewerCapableOf try to assess the quality of th… 0.28
reviewerCapableOf understand their role 0.28
reviewerCapableOf write their reviews 0.28
reviewerCapableOf destroy copies of manuscripts 0.28
reviewerCapableOf review the research 0.28
reviewerCapableOf feel more comfortable 0.28
reviewerCapableOf like the book 0.28
reviewerCapableOf become aware of plagiarism 0.27
reviewerCapableOf feel unqualified to review the … 0.27
reviewerCapableOf access full text article 0.27
reviewerCapableOf anticipate longer delay 0.27
reviewerCapableOf apply the selection criteria 0.27
reviewerCapableOf assess the relevance of the sub… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf assigned high risk of bias 0.27
reviewerCapableOf choose to unveil his/her identi… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf conduct blind review of the art… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf considered all of the above 0.27
reviewerCapableOf contact the academic editor 0.27
reviewerCapableOf cooperate with the journal 0.27
reviewerCapableOf determine the manuscript's suit… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf disclose every situation 0.27
reviewerCapableOf disclose to editor-in-chief any… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf earn point 0.27
reviewerCapableOf evaluate the quality of an arti… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf evaluate thoroughness 0.27
reviewerCapableOf extract result 0.27
reviewerCapableOf fill the review form 0.27
reviewerCapableOf get immediate answers 0.27
reviewerCapableOf get the product 0.27
reviewerCapableOf give average score of 4.6/5 0.27
reviewerCapableOf identify gap 0.27
reviewerCapableOf inform the editor-in-chief/hand… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf interact with author 0.27
reviewerCapableOf keep the content of the manuscr… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf know about existing system 0.27
reviewerCapableOf know the names of the authors 0.27
reviewerCapableOf look for mistake 0.27
reviewerCapableOf look for proposal 0.27
reviewerCapableOf note the name of the colleague(s 0.27
reviewerCapableOf pay more attention 0.27
reviewerCapableOf provide raw data 0.27
reviewerCapableOf read each article 0.27
reviewerCapableOf recommend the manuscript 0.27
reviewerCapableOf respond to the invite 0.27
reviewerCapableOf return the item 0.27
reviewerCapableOf search psycinfo 0.27
reviewerCapableOf search web of science 0.27
reviewerCapableOf send in several tips 0.27
reviewerCapableOf strive to correct deficiency 0.27
reviewerCapableOf strive to offer feedback 0.27
reviewerCapableOf submit descriptions of their pi… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf take advantage of any informati… 0.27
reviewerCapableOf use the software 0.27
reviewerCapableOf view document 0.27
reviewerCapableOf view review 0.27
reviewerCapableOf work in the field 0.27
reviewerCapableOf post on goodreads 0.26
reviewerCapableOf tell the author 0.26
reviewerCapableOf praise the food 0.26
reviewerCapableOf review the manuscript 0.26
reviewerCapableOf like size 0.26
reviewerCapableOf like the design 0.26
reviewerCapableOf make report 0.25
reviewerCapableOf notify editorial office 0.25
reviewerCapableOf provide insight 0.25
reviewerCapableOf spent thousands of hours 0.25
reviewerCapableOf accept the review 0.25
reviewerCapableOf address the five instructional … 0.25
reviewerCapableOf ask multiple editing of a study 0.25
reviewerCapableOf assess full text of the articles 0.25
reviewerCapableOf assess the adequacy of plans 0.25
reviewerCapableOf assess the faintest clues 0.25
reviewerCapableOf assess the paper’s suitability 0.25
reviewerCapableOf attend 0.25
reviewerCapableOf be a subject matter expert 0.25
reviewerCapableOf bring up to three guests per vi… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf build up reputation 0.25
reviewerCapableOf check the article 0.25
reviewerCapableOf clarify most of the relevant co… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf click on the review icon 0.25
reviewerCapableOf collaborate on the document 0.25
reviewerCapableOf comment on more than three chap… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf communicate the observations/re… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf communicate via the sis bulleti… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf complete form 0.25
reviewerCapableOf comply with best practice 0.25
reviewerCapableOf conduct a phone interview 0.25
reviewerCapableOf conduct the literature search 0.25
reviewerCapableOf copy the review 0.25
reviewerCapableOf create detailed report 0.25
reviewerCapableOf determine the compliance of the… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf end up being the curator 0.25
reviewerCapableOf examine the entry 0.25
reviewerCapableOf examine the narrative elements 0.25
reviewerCapableOf examine the software code 0.25
reviewerCapableOf express the elements of the mov… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf fill in gap 0.25
reviewerCapableOf find any inaccuracies 0.25
reviewerCapableOf find inaccuracy 0.25
reviewerCapableOf focus on key concepts 0.25
reviewerCapableOf get one vote 0.25
reviewerCapableOf get started 0.25
reviewerCapableOf give higher ratings 0.25
reviewerCapableOf give more credit 0.25
reviewerCapableOf go on to state 0.25
reviewerCapableOf hasreviewe the content 0.25
reviewerCapableOf identify citation 0.25
reviewerCapableOf inform the reader 0.25
reviewerCapableOf interact with each other 0.25
reviewerCapableOf judge the merit of the research 0.25
reviewerCapableOf keep all information 0.25
reviewerCapableOf look at each session 0.25
reviewerCapableOf look at performance measurements 0.25
reviewerCapableOf look at program management 0.25
reviewerCapableOf look at proposed business models 0.25
reviewerCapableOf look at staff qualifications 0.25
reviewerCapableOf look for at least two consecuti… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf look for paper 0.25
reviewerCapableOf make de facto decisions 0.25
reviewerCapableOf make edits 0.25
reviewerCapableOf make final recommendation 0.25
reviewerCapableOf make purchase 0.25
reviewerCapableOf make the case 0.25
reviewerCapableOf never had problem 0.25
reviewerCapableOf notify the wslcb 0.25
reviewerCapableOf point out the need 0.25
reviewerCapableOf prepare detailed written critiq… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf preserve datum 0.25
reviewerCapableOf promise to undertake the confid… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf provide context 0.25
reviewerCapableOf provide link 0.25
reviewerCapableOf provide tag-specific rating 0.25
reviewerCapableOf rate each study 0.25
reviewerCapableOf read same book 0.25
reviewerCapableOf read the work 0.25
reviewerCapableOf receive honorarium 0.25
reviewerCapableOf recommend changes of the text 0.25
reviewerCapableOf refuse the review 0.25
reviewerCapableOf reject the code 0.25
reviewerCapableOf report similar results 0.25
reviewerCapableOf request documentation 0.25
reviewerCapableOf request entrant 0.25
reviewerCapableOf request to see revised version 0.25
reviewerCapableOf return the document 0.25
reviewerCapableOf review the product 0.25
reviewerCapableOf screen each title 0.25
reviewerCapableOf search cinahl 0.25
reviewerCapableOf search for document 0.25
reviewerCapableOf select recommendation 0.25
reviewerCapableOf send to editorial department 0.25
reviewerCapableOf serve through completion of the… 0.25
reviewerCapableOf solve problem 0.25
reviewerCapableOf spot inaccuracy 0.25
reviewerCapableOf submit critique 0.25
reviewerCapableOf support conclusion 0.25
reviewerCapableOf support hausa 0.25
reviewerCapableOf support oromo 0.25
reviewerCapableOf support swahili 0.25
reviewerCapableOf take active role 0.25
reviewerCapableOf take reasonable steps 0.25
reviewerCapableOf try to be helpful 0.25
reviewerCapableOf understand 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use a kappa test 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use full scoring range 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use printable form 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use pseudonym 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use the imet 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use the nih scale of 1‐9 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use the on-line submission form 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use the opportunity 0.25
reviewerCapableOf use validated scale 0.25
reviewerCapableOf used remote control 0.25
reviewerCapableOf visit the venue 0.25
reviewerCapableOf decline to review article 0.25
reviewerCapableOf give four stars 0.25
reviewerCapableOf give low rating 0.25
reviewerCapableOf like portability 0.25
reviewerCapableOf receive the product/service 0.25
reviewerCapableOf recommend the book 0.25
reviewerCapableOf return copies of manuscripts 0.25
reviewerCapableOf provide valuable suggestions 0.25
reviewerCapableOf share their knowledge 0.24
reviewerCapableOf feel unqualified to review the … 0.24
reviewerCapableOf review assigned manuscript 0.24
reviewerCapableOf report issue 0.24
reviewerCapableOf focus their evaluation 0.24
reviewerCapableOf like design 0.24
reviewerCapableOf praised characterization 0.24
reviewerCapableOf say positive things 0.24
reviewerCapableOf arrange meeting 0.23
reviewerCapableOf give bad review 0.23
reviewerCapableOf like the battery 0.23
reviewerCapableOf never read the book 0.23
reviewerCapableOf praise the game's graphics 0.23
reviewerCapableOf get chance 0.23
reviewerCapableOf consult with colleague 0.22
reviewerCapableOf give good review 0.21
reviewerCapableOf like the usability 0.21
reviewerCapableOf note problem 0.21
reviewerCapableOf cite exceptional customer servi… 0.20
reviewerCapableOf contribute their time 0.20
reviewerCapableOf contribute to readability 0.20
reviewerCapableOf discuss associated supplementar… 0.20
reviewerCapableOf praised the art 0.20
reviewerCapableOf take the years of research expe… 0.20
reviewerCapableOf use the service 0.20
reviewerCapableOf write the manuscript 0.20
reviewerCapableOf take week 0.19
reviewerCapableOf like the film 0.19
reviewerCapableOf praise the book 0.19
reviewerCapableOf appreciate novelty 0.18
reviewerCapableOf become aware of fraud 0.18
reviewerCapableOf become aware of such scientific… 0.18
reviewerCapableOf compromise their anonymity 0.18
reviewerCapableOf criticize the book 0.18
reviewerCapableOf describe the game 0.18
reviewerCapableOf dislike the book 0.18
reviewerCapableOf do favor 0.18
reviewerCapableOf do poor job 0.18
reviewerCapableOf enjoy interchangeable cases 0.18
reviewerCapableOf evaluate the candidate's potent… 0.18
reviewerCapableOf find many factual errors 0.18
reviewerCapableOf find misleading statements 0.18
reviewerCapableOf focus on approach 0.18
reviewerCapableOf like the price 0.18
reviewerCapableOf look for possible setup problems 0.18
reviewerCapableOf lose credibility 0.18
reviewerCapableOf praised humor of the story 0.18
reviewerCapableOf realize the importance of our a… 0.18
reviewerCapableOf register complaint 0.18
reviewerCapableOf respond to editorial requests 0.18
reviewerCapableOf save time 0.18
reviewerCapableOf say in their report 0.18
reviewerCapableOf turn out to be least mistaken 0.18
reviewerCapableOf use the weblink 0.18
reviewerCapableOf warn the public 0.18
reviewerCapableOf write in part 0.18
reviewerCapableOf find book 0.17
reviewerCapableOf become aware of other unethical… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf bring the lowdown 0.16
reviewerCapableOf choose the lowest end alienware… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf commented on the truth 0.16
reviewerCapableOf contribute to the improvement o… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf correct grammatical errors 0.16
reviewerCapableOf describe the hotel 0.16
reviewerCapableOf discuss the data of the manuscr… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf end the review 0.16
reviewerCapableOf evaluate the research plan 0.16
reviewerCapableOf express reservation 0.16
reviewerCapableOf feel unable to render an object… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf focus on typo 0.16
reviewerCapableOf get the impression 0.16
reviewerCapableOf get the word 0.16
reviewerCapableOf guarantee timeliness 0.16
reviewerCapableOf improve the paper 0.16
reviewerCapableOf like graphic 0.16
reviewerCapableOf like the story 0.16
reviewerCapableOf like the zoom 0.16
reviewerCapableOf lose interest 0.16
reviewerCapableOf love new features 0.16
reviewerCapableOf love the iphone 5s 0.16
reviewerCapableOf love the product 0.16
reviewerCapableOf make incorrect assumption 0.16
reviewerCapableOf make valid and substantial judg… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf miss same included study 0.16
reviewerCapableOf notify the applicant 0.16
reviewerCapableOf play on exalted level 0.16
reviewerCapableOf praised high-interest examples 0.16
reviewerCapableOf praised pedagogy 0.16
reviewerCapableOf praised purposeful art program 0.16
reviewerCapableOf provide proper review report 0.16
reviewerCapableOf pull their punches 0.16
reviewerCapableOf recognize potential competing i… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf reveal the data of the manuscri… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf review the topic of a manuscript 0.16
reviewerCapableOf review the work 0.16
reviewerCapableOf spent hour 0.16
reviewerCapableOf take long time 0.16
reviewerCapableOf verify every review 0.16
reviewerCapableOf view the video clip 0.16
reviewerCapableOf withhold submission of the revi… 0.16
reviewerCapableOf work in same field 0.16
reviewerCapableOf write about book 0.16
reviewerCapableOf complain about noise 0.16
reviewerCapableOf find bug 0.15
reviewerCapableOf cross the line 0.15
reviewerCapableOf compliment the staff 0.14
reviewerCapableOf disclose the article 0.09