---

reviewer → CapableOf → remain anonymous	0.63
reviewer → HasProperty → correct	0.62
reviewer → CapableOf → make comment	0.62
reviewer → CapableOf → make decision	0.61
reviewer → HasProperty → professional	0.61
reviewer → ReceivesAction → satisfied	0.61
reviewer → CapableOf → provide feedback	0.60
reviewer → HasProperty → honest	0.59
reviewer → CapableOf → add comment	0.59
reviewer → CapableOf → write review	0.58
reviewer → HasA → unique product review history	0.58
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected	0.58
reviewer → CapableOf → claim credit	0.57
reviewer → CapableOf → express their views	0.57
reviewer → ReceivesAction → experienced	0.57
reviewer → CapableOf → review article	0.57
reviewer → CapableOf → discussed review	0.56
reviewer → HasA → experience	0.56
reviewer → CapableOf → bear in mind	0.56
reviewer → HasA → deleted reviews	0.56
reviewer → CapableOf → disclose any conflicts of interest	0.55
reviewer → HasA → the option	0.55
reviewer → HasProperty → knowledgeable	0.55
reviewer → HasProperty → open	0.55
reviewer → CapableOf → complete their reviews	0.55
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend rejection	0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → consulted	0.54
reviewer → CapableOf → complete the review	0.54
reviewer → CapableOf → read book	0.54
reviewer → CapableOf → discuss their comments	0.54
reviewer → CapableOf → posted more than one review	0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → contacted	0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to declare competing interests	0.54
reviewer → ReceivesAction → blinded	0.54
reviewer → CapableOf → receive email	0.53
reviewer → CapableOf → sign their reviews	0.53
reviewer → HasProperty → independent	0.53
reviewer → CapableOf → purchase the product	0.53
reviewer → ReceivesAction → approved	0.53
reviewer → HasProperty → human	0.53
reviewer → HasProperty → happy	0.53
reviewer → CapableOf → explain reason	0.52
reviewer → CapableOf → assess methodological quality	0.52
reviewer → CapableOf → opt to publons	0.52
reviewer → CapableOf → read the paper	0.52
reviewer → CapableOf → submit review	0.52
reviewer → HasProperty → objective	0.52
reviewer → ReceivesAction → qualified	0.52
reviewer → ReceivesAction → trusted	0.52
reviewer → CapableOf → accept the paper	0.51
reviewer → CapableOf → submit their reviews	0.51
reviewer → CapableOf → make recommendation	0.51
recommendation → CreatedBy → reviewer	0.51
reviewer → HasProperty → impartial	0.51
reviewer → CapableOf → declare any conflict of interest	0.51
reviewer → CapableOf → avoid personal comments	0.51
reviewer → ReceivesAction → focused	0.51
reviewer → HasProperty → fair	0.50
reviewer → CapableOf → see comment	0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited	0.50
reviewer → CapableOf → read the article	0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → addressed	0.50
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend revision	0.50
reviewer → HasProperty → positive	0.50
reviewer → HasA → opinion	0.50
reviewer → CapableOf → inform the journal	0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unaware of each other’s identity	0.50
reviewer → CapableOf → volunteer their time	0.50
reviewer → ReceivesAction → convinced	0.50
reviewer → CapableOf → perform data extraction	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → avoid conflicts of interest	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → review paper	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → provide input	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → make note	0.49
reviewer → HasProperty → familiar	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → make sure to look	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → participate in the peer review process	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → score application	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → read the code	0.49
reviewer → CapableOf → work in pair	0.49
reviewer → HasProperty → busy	0.48
reviewer → HasProperty → clear	0.48
reviewer → HasA → phd	0.48
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed	0.48
reviewer → ReceivesAction → assessed	0.48
reviewer → CapableOf → judge the manuscript	0.48
reviewer → CapableOf → leave review	0.48
reviewer → CapableOf → provide review	0.48
reviewer → CapableOf → maintain anonymity	0.47
reviewer → HasProperty → vigilant	0.47
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate submission	0.47
reviewer → CapableOf → spend more time	0.47
reviewer → HasProperty → competent	0.47
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited to conduct review	0.47
reviewer → HasA → preference	0.47
reviewer → ReceivesAction → quick to point	0.46
reviewer → HasA → little	0.46
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to return comment	0.46
reviewer → CapableOf → sign a confidentiality agreement	0.46
reviewer → CapableOf → complete the task	0.46
reviewer → CapableOf → agree with author	0.46
reviewer → HasA → concern	0.46
reviewer → CapableOf → go to moderate interest	0.46
reviewer → HasProperty → wise	0.46
reviewer → CapableOf → take responsibility	0.46
reviewer → ReceivesAction → associated with relevant journal	0.46
reviewer → ReceivesAction → excluded	0.46
reviewer → CapableOf → inform the editor	0.46
reviewer → HasA → four weeks	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → request book	0.45
reviewer → ReceivesAction → completed the review	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → receive complimentary copy of the book	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → discuss difference	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → post review	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → identify relevant published work	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → say same thing	0.45
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited to review manuscript	0.45
reviewer → HasProperty → external	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → reviewed the content	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → assess risk of bias	0.45
reviewer → CapableOf → choose a pick of the year	0.44
reviewer → CapableOf → operate under strict guidelines	0.44
reviewer → ReceivesAction → drawn	0.44
reviewer → ReceivesAction → encouraged	0.44
reviewer → HasA → responsibility	0.44
reviewer → CapableOf → go to skepticism	0.44
reviewer → HasProperty → careful	0.44
reviewer → CapableOf → give 5 stars	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → give positive review	0.43
reviewer → HasProperty → enthusiastic	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → follow instruction	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → assess abstract	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → send in anonymous version	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → consider the possibility	0.43
reviewer → HasA → much experience	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → like article	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → use the word	0.43
reviewer → ReceivesAction → accepted	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → opted to remain anonymous	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → identify author	0.43
reviewer → ReceivesAction → concerned	0.43
reviewer → CapableOf → request clarification	0.42
reviewer → ReceivesAction → aware of affiliation	0.42
reviewer → CapableOf → assess study	0.42
reviewer → CapableOf → make conclusion	0.42
reviewer → CapableOf → play vital role	0.42
reviewer → HasProperty → important	0.42
reviewer → HasProperty → unpaid	0.42
reviewer → CapableOf → reviewed the information	0.42
reviewer → CapableOf → find issue	0.42
reviewer → HasPrerequisite → additional information	0.42
reviewer → ReceivesAction → paid	0.41
reviewer → CapableOf → read the introduction	0.41
reviewer → ReceivesAction → independent of author	0.41
reviewer → HasA → their own horror stories	0.41
reviewer → CapableOf → share idea	0.41
reviewer → CapableOf → get their due recognition	0.41
reviewer → CapableOf → suspect undisclosed conflict of interest	0.41
reviewer → ReceivesAction → notified	0.41
reviewer → HasA → different opinions	0.40
reviewer → ReceivesAction → suggested by author	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → read the book	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → provide the author	0.40
reviewer → ReceivesAction → added	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → read abstract	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → know the identity of the authors	0.40
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by editor	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → update their reviews	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → review code	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → look at content	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → spend two days	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate article	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → make point	0.40
reviewer → CapableOf → decline to review manuscript	0.39
reviewer → CapableOf → submit their comments	0.39
reviewer → HasProperty → generous	0.39
reviewer → CapableOf → respect intellectual independence of the authors	0.39
reviewer → HasProperty → critical	0.39
reviewer → CapableOf → post negative reviews	0.39
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate following additional items	0.39
reviewer → ReceivesAction → surprised	0.39
reviewer → CapableOf → like the way	0.39
reviewer → CapableOf → collect datum	0.39
reviewer → CapableOf → review abstract	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → abstract datum	0.38
reviewer → HasProperty → unfamiliar	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → determine scientific and technical merit	0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → bound by same rules	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → agree to review manuscript	0.38
reviewer → HasA → question	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → return their comments	0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → held accountable	0.38
reviewer → HasProperty → alert	0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → reviewed	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → assess study quality	0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → balanced	0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → critical of conclusion	0.38
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen by person	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → report concern	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate paper	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → reject the manuscript	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → bound by same requirements of confidentiality	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → like the paper	0.38
reviewer → CapableOf → perform the review	0.37
reviewer → HasProperty → sure	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → check	0.37
reviewer → HasProperty → unanimous	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → provide critique	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → submit their reports	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → do the review	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → use criterion	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → inform editorial office	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → return the manuscript	0.37
reviewer → ReceivesAction → involved in study selection	0.37
reviewer → HasProperty → unknown	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → apply the inclusion criteria	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → assess the correctness of sources	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → judge the quality of the manuscript	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → accept the invitation	0.37
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to comment in their written critiques	0.37
reviewer → CapableOf → buy book	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → look at figure	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → provide constructive comments	0.36
reviewer → HasProperty → wrong	0.36
reviewer → HasProperty → sensitive	0.36
reviewer → HasProperty → constructive	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → support their judgments	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → do good job	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → praise graphic	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → praise the game	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → describe their experience	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → spend much time	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → provide example	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → determine	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → raise important point	0.36
reviewer → HasProperty → interested	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → review the book	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → alert the editor	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → place less emphasis	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → submit report	0.36
reviewer → CapableOf → notify the editor	0.35
reviewer → ReceivesAction → willing to provide follow-up advice	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → assess methodological quality of the studies	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → take note	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → agree to assess paper	0.35
reviewer → ReceivesAction → trained	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → take look	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → determine the extent	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → seem happy	0.35
reviewer → HasProperty → consistent	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → conduct the review	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → take into account	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → assess trial quality	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → declare possible conflicts of interest	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → make effort	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → look at table	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → publish review	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → tell	0.35
reviewer → CapableOf → use the product	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → agree to open peer review	0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → based on their expertise	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → contact the editor	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → call the book	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → read the manuscript	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → search embase	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → explain their judgments	0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → well-versed	0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → identified	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → ensure solid impact of papers	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → give the review comments	0.34
reviewer → HasA → reservation	0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → bound to treat the manuscript	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → assign score	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend the article	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → do the job	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate application	0.34
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen for their expertise	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → substantiate their comments	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → consider each of the following items	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → reject the article	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → discuss the paper	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → make mistake	0.34
reviewer → CapableOf → draw the editor’s attention	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → consider the data sharing plan	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → assess the correctness of recommendations	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → share comment	0.33
reviewer → HasA → competing interests	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → provide overall impact/priority score	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → rate submission	0.33
reviewer → HasA → account	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → opt to reveal their name	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → seek information	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → discuss issue	0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to provide formative feedback	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → expect to receive new version	0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → appointed by the editor	0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to declare any conflict of interest	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → use standardized form	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → contact author	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → point out issue	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → review the code	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → review change	0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → rejected	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate originality	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate the work	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → know the author	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → formulate their statements	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate conceptual framework	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate general approach	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → examine strategy	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → follow ethical policies	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → share their thoughts	0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to provide comment	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → take care	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → notify the journal	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → provide reference	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → return their recommendations	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → prepare written report	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → review title	0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by program officers	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate the file	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → extract following data	0.33
reviewer → CapableOf → guess	0.33
reviewer → HasProperty → good	0.33
reviewer → ReceivesAction → biased	0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → willing to overlook an occasional spelling error	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → do their utmost	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → sign their reports	0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → requested to go through article	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → give high marks	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → inform the editorial board	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → use the information	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → accept request	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → give honest review	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → determine the eligibility of all studies	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → accept the article	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → participate	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate tool	0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → blinded to author	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → suggest correction	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → review document	0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to complete the review	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → do their job	0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → comment on article	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → accept change	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → assess full texts	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → indicate iiany substantial similarity	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → take following factors	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → judge effective usefulness	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → comment on the paper	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → conduct their reviews	0.32
reviewer → HasProperty → prompt	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → review the material	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → discuss discrepancy	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → make choice	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → edit review	0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → split	0.32
reviewer → HasProperty → complete	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → comment on weakness	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → wish to involve colleague	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → validate for ms-drg	0.32
reviewer → ReceivesAction → eligible for reduced price	0.32
reviewer → CapableOf → find the fit	0.32
reviewer → HasProperty → tech	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → start their reviews	0.31
reviewer → HasProperty → helpful	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → miss the point	0.31
reviewer → HasProperty → unhappy	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → consider the following	0.31
reviewer → HasA → personal knowledge	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → give separate score	0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → recognized for their work	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → address following questions	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → review full-text articles	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → scan abstract	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → spend less time	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → assess the completeness	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → engage in discussion	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → rate the paper	0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → notified by email	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → validate the information	0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to make recommendation	0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → resolved through discussion	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → compare their results	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → provide evaluation	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → bought the product	0.31
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected to evaluate separate components of a manuscript	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → provide written feedback	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → explain their scholarly judgments	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → specialize in same scholarly area	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → love the location	0.31
reviewer → HasProperty → complimentary	0.31
reviewer → CapableOf → look at live casino games	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → look at video poker	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → leave feedback	0.30
reviewer → HasProperty → liable	0.30
reviewer → HasA → reputation	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → accept the task	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → provide tip	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → look for reason	0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → free to decline invitations	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → use standard form	0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → recruited	0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → resolved by consensus	0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → matched to the paper	0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → assigned to the application	0.30
reviewer → HasA → expectation	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → raise the issue	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → use form	0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → disqualified	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → made substantive errors	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → select article	0.30
reviewer → HasA → relevant financial relationships	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → use the cochrane tool	0.30
reviewer → ReceivesAction → assigned to paper	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → correct their review	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → act as arbiter	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → treat article	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → make every effort	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → approve the article	0.30
reviewer → HasProperty → neutral	0.30
reviewer → HasProperty → lazy	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → praise the music	0.30
reviewer → HasProperty → great	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → get thing	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → look at time	0.30
reviewer → CapableOf → prefer arm's lengthletters	0.30
reviewer → HasA → complaint	0.30
reviewer → HasProperty → well-read	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → judge clarity	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → submit paper	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → purchased the item	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → contact editorial office	0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to have scientific degree	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → note the mastery of terminology	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → find ambiguity	0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected to review submission	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → love book	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend to the editor	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → give overall score	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → learn	0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → known to each other	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → identify relevant studies	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → read submission	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → use standardised data extraction form	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → concur with the rater	0.29
reviewer → HasA → a lot of power	0.29
reviewer → HasA → relationship	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → approach each submission	0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → mixed	0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → consulted in the case of disagreement	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → download manuscript	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → pay the editor’s attention	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → refer to the work	0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to evaluate paper	0.29
reviewer → HasProperty → excellent	0.29
reviewer → HasProperty → fine	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → like the taste	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → play the game	0.29
reviewer → ReceivesAction → engaged	0.29
reviewer → CapableOf → search database	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → prepare the review	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → drawn into prolonged disputes	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → understand their role	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → aware of the authorship of the manuscript	0.28
reviewer → HasA → every right	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → pay particular attention	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → note the completeness	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → intended to be read by author	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → entitled	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → write their reviews	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → concealed throughout the review process	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → extract the potentialities of the researcher	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → give an 8	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → answer specific questions	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to comment on the overlap	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → substantiate deep and well-reasoned analysis	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend the paper	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → tell the truth	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → come with fresh mind	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → find little	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → review available resources	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → praise the title's replay value	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → critical of glitch	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → check change	0.28
reviewer → HasProperty → serious	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → try to assess the quality of the work	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → click the link	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → select book	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → screen full-text articles	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → notify the editor of any similarities	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → read	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to weigh the contribution of a paper	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → review the research	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → destroy copies of manuscripts	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → feel more comfortable	0.28
reviewer → CapableOf → like the book	0.28
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unaware of the identity of the authors	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → feel unqualified to review the research	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → become aware of plagiarism	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → identify gap	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate thoroughness	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → read each article	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to identify relevant published work	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → anticipate longer delay	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → completed at least one review	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → look for mistake	0.27
reviewer → HasProperty → harder	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate the quality of an article	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → fill the review form	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → view document	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → assess the relevance of the submission	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to emphasize innovation	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → get the product	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → respond to the invite	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → access full text article	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → cooperate with the journal	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → get immediate answers	0.27
reviewer → HasProperty → perfect	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → likely to decline	0.27
reviewer → HasA → different tastes	0.27
reviewer → IsA → our critics	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → reassigned	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → search psycinfo	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → conveyed to the author	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → conduct blind review of the articles	0.27
reviewer → HasA → the authority	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → know the names of the authors	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → search web of science	0.27
reviewer → HasA → the scopus-id	0.27
reviewer → HasA → researcher-id thomson reuters	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → return the item	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → consulted to reach consensus	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → work in the field	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → made public	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by associate editors	0.27
reviewer → RelatedTo → abstract submission and review process	0.27
reviewer → AtLocation → the department of history	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → submit descriptions of their picks	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → strive to offer feedback	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → strive to correct deficiency	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → earn point	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → provide raw data	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → pay more attention	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → based on recommendation	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → disclose to editor-in-chief any financial relations	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → disclose every situation	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → use the software	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → look for proposal	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to address consideration	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → charged	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → view review	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → found on the past tests	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → found on all posts pages	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → extract result	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → take advantage of any information	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → contact the academic editor	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → note the name of the colleague(s	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → familiar with regulation	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → apply the selection criteria	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → keep the content of the manuscript	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → interact with author	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → assigned high risk of bias	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → choose to unveil his/her identity	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → give average score of 4.6/5	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → send in several tips	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → know about existing system	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → inform the editor-in-chief/handling editor	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → considered all of the above	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend the manuscript	0.27
reviewer → CapableOf → determine the manuscript's suitability	0.27
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by the size	0.26
reviewer → HasProperty → well-known	0.26
reviewer → CapableOf → post on goodreads	0.26
reviewer → CapableOf → tell the author	0.26
reviewer → CapableOf → praise the food	0.26
reviewer → CapableOf → review the manuscript	0.26
reviewer → ReceivesAction → removed	0.26
reviewer → CapableOf → like size	0.26
reviewer → CapableOf → like the design	0.26
reviewer → ReceivesAction → disappointed	0.26
reviewer → ReceivesAction → confused	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → upset	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → make report	0.25
reviewer → PartOf → a member of our board	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → spent thousands of hours	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → provide insight	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → notify editorial office	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → read same book	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → assess full text of the articles	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → get one vote	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → used remote control	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → express the elements of the movie	0.25
reviewer → HasA → disability	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → visit the venue	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → reject the code	0.25
reviewer → AtLocation → arm’s-length	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unable to agree a joint outcome recommendation	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → end up being the curator	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → clarify most of the relevant concerns	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → white	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → assess the faintest clues	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → send to editorial department	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → find any inaccuracies	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → find inaccuracy	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → go on to state	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → fill in gap	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → screen each title	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → select recommendation	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → persuaded to take down their review	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen by nsf	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → chosen by neh staff	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → make purchase	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → take reasonable steps	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → look at each session	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use pseudonym	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → submit critique	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → support oromo	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → support swahili	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → support hausa	0.25
reviewer → HasA → supplementary material for e-only publication	0.25
reviewer → HasA → the game	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → accept the review	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → concordant	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → communicate the observations/requirements	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend changes of the text	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → receive honorarium	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → read the work	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use the nih scale of 1‐9	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited to review the article	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use the opportunity	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use a kappa test	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → communicate via the sis bulletin board process	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → create detailed report	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → supposed to concentrate on the quality	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → required to be nafme members	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → aware of personal bias	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → open-minded	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → bring up to three guests per visit	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → conduct a phone interview	0.25
reviewer → HasA → different expectations	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → refuse the review	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → collaborate on the document	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → get started	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → requested to consider a number of points	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → build up reputation	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → solve problem	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → give higher ratings	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → ask multiple editing of a study	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → flexible	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → search for document	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to emphasize significance	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to classify the paper	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → attend	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to check statistical methods	0.25
reviewer → AtLocation → the editor's discretion	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → queried on correctness	0.25
reviewer → HasA → all the information	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → conduct the literature search	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → request to see revised version	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → necessary to evaluate the research papers	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → understand	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → click on the review icon	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → acquainted with key individuals	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → comment on more than three chapters	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → listed on martindale.com	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → flavoured with a dash of sorcery	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → flavoured with spiced	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → review the product	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to address the two merit review criteria	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → instructed to review application	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → be a subject matter expert	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → copy the review	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → based on their publications	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → hasreviewe the content	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → less critical	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → return the document	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → complete form	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → make the case	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → detailed	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → protected	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → seated at each station	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → rate each study	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → support conclusion	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → prepare detailed written critique	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → examine the entry	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → optional	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unlikely to be aware	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → request documentation	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use validated scale	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → assess the paper’s suitability	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → look for paper	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → notify the wslcb	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → point out the need	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → familiar with technical issues	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → serve through completion of the project	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → report similar results	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use full scoring range	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → provide context	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use the imet	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked several questions	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → keep all information	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → determine the compliance of the article	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → search cinahl	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → known to the journal editor	0.25
reviewer → Desires → pass a review request	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use the on-line submission form	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → use printable form	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → identify citation	0.25
reviewer → Desires → the balance of the review	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → never had problem	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → qualified to make judgments	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → look at proposed business models	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → look at performance measurements	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → look at staff qualifications	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → look at program management	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → request entrant	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → provide link	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → invited in confidence	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → make final recommendation	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → assess the adequacy of plans	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → check the article	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → free to change their review	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → informed of final decision	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → interact with each other	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → provide tag-specific rating	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → make edits	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → address the five instructional components	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → spot inaccuracy	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → take active role	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → give more credit	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → senior	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → try to be helpful	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → look for at least two consecutive paragraphs	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → make de facto decisions	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → designated by the chairperson	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to set the context	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → promise to undertake the confidentiality of materials	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → examine the software code	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → preserve datum	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → proactive	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → selected by the conference committee	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → examine the narrative elements	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → dismissive	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → inform the reader	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → comply with best practice	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → focus on key concepts	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → judge the merit of the research	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → referred by number	0.25
reviewer → ReceivesAction → asked to serve as a committee member	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → give four stars	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → decline to review article	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → recommend the book	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → return copies of manuscripts	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → like portability	0.25
reviewer → HasProperty → supportive	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → give low rating	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → receive the product/service	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → provide valuable suggestions	0.25
reviewer → CapableOf → share their knowledge	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → review assigned manuscript	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → feel unqualified to review the assigned manuscript	0.24
reviewer → HasProperty → late	0.24
reviewer → HasProperty → courteous	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → report issue	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → praised characterization	0.24
reviewer → ReceivesAction → delighted	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → say positive things	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → focus their evaluation	0.24
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by portability	0.24
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by the design	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → like design	0.24
reviewer → CapableOf → arrange meeting	0.23
reviewer → CapableOf → give bad review	0.23
reviewer → CapableOf → like the battery	0.23
reviewer → ReceivesAction → cautioned	0.23
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by the durability	0.23
reviewer → CapableOf → praise the game's graphics	0.23
reviewer → CapableOf → never read the book	0.23
reviewer → HasProperty → adamant	0.23
reviewer → CapableOf → get chance	0.23
reviewer → HasProperty → bad	0.22
reviewer → HasProperty → uncomfortable	0.22
reviewer → HasA → personal or professional connection	0.22
reviewer → ReceivesAction → amazed	0.22
reviewer → HasProperty → inconsistent	0.22
reviewer → HasProperty → hostile	0.22
reviewer → ReceivesAction → requested to follow excellent guideline	0.22
reviewer → CapableOf → consult with colleague	0.22
reviewer → CapableOf → note problem	0.21
reviewer → CapableOf → give good review	0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by price	0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → ignored	0.21
reviewer → HasProperty → passionate	0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → frustrated	0.21
reviewer → CapableOf → like the usability	0.21
reviewer → ReceivesAction → overwhelmed	0.21
reviewer → HasProperty → unfair	0.21
reviewer → CapableOf → contribute their time	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → use the service	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → praised the art	0.20
reviewer → ReceivesAction → encouraged to review the criteria	0.20
reviewer → HasProperty → unimpressed	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → cite exceptional customer service	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → take the years of research experience	0.20
reviewer → ReceivesAction → welcome to leave comments	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → discuss associated supplementary material	0.20
reviewer → ReceivesAction → impressed by screen	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → write the manuscript	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → contribute to readability	0.20
reviewer → HasA → conflict	0.20
reviewer → HasProperty → harsh	0.20
reviewer → CapableOf → take week	0.19
reviewer → AtLocation → rush	0.19
reviewer → HasProperty → rude	0.19
reviewer → CapableOf → like the film	0.19
reviewer → HasProperty → slow	0.19
reviewer → CapableOf → praise the book	0.19
reviewer → HasA → life	0.19
reviewer → HasA → bad day	0.19
reviewer → ReceivesAction → excused	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → praised humor of the story	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → lose credibility	0.18
reviewer → HasProperty → mean	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → look for possible setup problems	0.18
reviewer → HasProperty → common	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → dislike the book	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → say in their report	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → focus on approach	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate the candidate's potential	0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → reluctant to visit cited web pages	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → compromise their anonymity	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → realize the importance of our approach	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → like the price	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → describe the game	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → save time	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → turn out to be least mistaken	0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → certain of author	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → do favor	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → find many factual errors	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → find misleading statements	0.18
reviewer → HasA → high praise	0.18
reviewer → HasProperty → more positive	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → warn the public	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → use the weblink	0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → uninvited	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → enjoy interchangeable cases	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → criticize the book	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → do poor job	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → become aware of such scientific misconduct	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → become aware of fraud	0.18
reviewer → HasA → known history of antipathy	0.18
reviewer → HasProperty → cranky	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → respond to editorial requests	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → register complaint	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → appreciate novelty	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → write in part	0.18
reviewer → ReceivesAction → acknowledged in final report	0.18
reviewer → CapableOf → find book	0.17
reviewer → ReceivesAction → discouraged	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → like the zoom	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → make incorrect assumption	0.16
reviewer → HasProperty → thoughtful	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → commented on the truth	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → play on exalted level	0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → unable to review	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → end the review	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → work in same field	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → withhold submission of the review	0.16
reviewer → HasProperty → disinterested	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → contribute to the improvement of submitted works	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → correct grammatical errors	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → describe the hotel	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → view the video clip	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → review the work	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → get the impression	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → praised high-interest examples	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → praised pedagogy	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → praised purposeful art program	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → take long time	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → like the story	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → guarantee timeliness	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → discuss the data of the manuscripts	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → reveal the data of the manuscripts	0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → rendered speechless	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → write about book	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → focus on typo	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → like graphic	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → lose interest	0.16
reviewer → HasProperty → proud	0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → matched	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → love the iphone 5s	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → love new features	0.16
reviewer → HasA → the pleasure	0.16
reviewer → HasProperty → more concerned	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → make valid and substantial judgment	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → provide proper review report	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → spent hour	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → bring the lowdown	0.16
reviewer → HasProperty → responsive	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → get the word	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → evaluate the research plan	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → improve the paper	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → recognize potential competing interest	0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → paired with 4gb of ram	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → feel unable to render an objective judgement	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → pull their punches	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → review the topic of a manuscript	0.16
reviewer → ReceivesAction → encouraged to complete the review	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → become aware of other unethical behavior	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → choose the lowest end alienware laptop	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → verify every review	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → love the product	0.16
reviewer → HasProperty → attractive	0.16
reviewer → HasA → more experience	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → express reservation	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → miss same included study	0.16
reviewer → HasProperty → fortunate	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → notify the applicant	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → complain about noise	0.16
reviewer → CapableOf → find bug	0.15
reviewer → CapableOf → cross the line	0.15
reviewer → CapableOf → compliment the staff	0.14
reviewer → ReceivesAction → overloaded	0.13
reviewer → ReceivesAction → disturbed in their rooms	0.10
reviewer → CapableOf → disclose the article	0.09
reviewer → ReceivesAction → found inside the hreview	0.09